Guest

Message from: "Helmut Hort" Farshad Mohajeri wrote: > > "Helmut Hort" wrote in message > news:rt$tMZR8LHA.3152@anaxagvs227... > > > > Hi Farshad, > > > > will we have an uniDBCheckbox in 0.85? Further on it would be great, > > We already do have one TUniDBCheckbox impelemneted. > > > if > > the treeview-component works completely in web (we miss especially > > the reaction on the font-properties). > > What are those properties can you name? Hi Farshad, especially we need the possibility to change the standard font, size and colour for the treeview items. These features are important for the look and feel of our enduser frontend. Where did you hide the tunidbcheckbox? I can't find it in my installation which is actually the last you publisched on your website. Helmut .

Message from: "UniGui" Hi,Farshad. Use UniDBComboBox, when after obtain data,I can't use the mouse to DragDown operation in IE. WHY? .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "Helmut Hort" wrote in message news:rt$tMZR8LHA.3152@anaxagvs227... > > Hi Farshad, > > will we have an uniDBCheckbox in 0.85? Further on it would be great, We already do have one TUniDBCheckbox impelemneted. >if > the treeview-component works completely in web (we miss especially the > reaction on the font-properties). What are those properties can you name? .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "Dennis Ortiz" wrote in message news:%231KKNSY8LHA.1984@anaxagvs227... > Hi, > >> -Components can be created as "Web only" with no VCL implementation > > Even i undestand why some component make sense only in WebMode, for my > need this is dangerous. I've noticed that major group of people are using uniGUI for web development only and VCL mode is optional for them. I'm one of those who use VCL part too and it was the original idea behind uniGUI . Certainly the VCL part will continue to exist, but in a different mode. >I hope the focus between Web and Desktop remains like today. > It will. Only we may develope some components for web mode only and leave the VCL part implementation to the developers themselves or we may implement the Web part first and implement the VCL part later. .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "Junior/RO" wrote in message news:Jis9xfM8LHA.1984@anaxagvs227... > Farshad Mohajeri escreveu: > >> -Streaming of Forms will be possible > > please tell more about this... You will be able to apply Load or Save Forms from/to streams as possible in a regular Delphi app. .

Message from: "scarre" > -Custom component creation will be possible. ( Of course, it is possible > to create custom components right now, but implementation details > are fairly complex) In the true spirit of Delphi ! Hopefully this creates extra momentum. Way to go ! .

Message from: "scarre" Amazing work ! Looking forward to this new version. > -Components can be created as "Web only" with no VCL implementation If that means getting more out of ExtJS functionality faster, great, great news ! Congratulations again. .

Message from: "Dennis Ortiz" Hi, > -Components can be created as "Web only" with no VCL implementation Even i undestand why some component make sense only in WebMode, for my need this is dangerous. I hope the focus between Web and Desktop remains like today. .

Message from: "Fredy Caballero" Good news, amazing job. Regards. "Farshad Mohajeri" escribi=F3 en el mensaje de = noticias:F4XQz1K8LHA.3976@anaxagvs227... As I've stated many times before version 0.85.0 will play a crucial role = in this framework. It will redesign component system core with lots of = changes and enhancements.=20 Here is a list of some of these changes:=20 -"as" and "is" keywords will work as they should.=20 -Components can be created as "Web only" with no VCL implementation -All visual controls will be inherited from same root ancestor -Custom component creation will be possible. ( Of course, it is possible = to create custom components right now, but implementation details are = fairly complex) -Better OO design -Streaming of Forms will be possible -Component base for JS event handling will be prepared -and more... New core that we will introduce in v0.85 is developed under a different = branch and once it is completed I need to manually merge it into main = trunk. (An automatic merge will fail for sure because of massive changes = in some units) This may take a few days or more until merge is fully = completed and tested. While merge is under progress I can't publish = patch releases and I won't be able to test any reported case. In this = period you can continue reporting bugs and issues but I may be quite = slow in replying. After version 0.85 we will have one big "Bug Fix" release and another = big "Feature Centric" release. Also there will be a "Documentation = Centric" release. Regards, Farshad Mohajeri

Message from: "Anders Andersen" Den 01-04-2011 22:43, Farshad Mohajeri skrev: > As I've stated many times before version 0.85.0 will play a crucial role > in this framework. It will redesign component system core with lots of > changes and enhancements. Excellent news! Looking forward to it! Anders E. Andersen .

Message from: "Helmut Hort" Hi Farshad, will we have an uniDBCheckbox in 0.85? Further on it would be great, if the treeview-component works completely in web (we miss especially the reaction on the font-properties). Regards Helmut -- .

Message from: "Junior/RO" Farshad Mohajeri escreveu: > -Streaming of Forms will be possible please tell more about this... .

Message from: "Cristiano Testai" Good news Farshad!! Cristiano Testai Brazil "Farshad Mohajeri" wrote in message = news:F4XQz1K8LHA.3976@anaxagvs227... As I've stated many times before version 0.85.0 will play a crucial = role in this framework. It will redesign component system core with lots = of changes and enhancements.=20 Here is a list of some of these changes:=20 -"as" and "is" keywords will work as they should.=20 -Components can be created as "Web only" with no VCL implementation -All visual controls will be inherited from same root ancestor -Custom component creation will be possible. ( Of course, it is = possible to create custom components right now, but implementation = details are fairly complex) -Better OO design -Streaming of Forms will be possible -Component base for JS event handling will be prepared -and more... New core that we will introduce in v0.85 is developed under a = different branch and once it is completed I need to manually merge it = into main trunk. (An automatic merge will fail for sure because of = massive changes in some units) This may take a few days or more until = merge is fully completed and tested. While merge is under progress I = can't publish patch releases and I won't be able to test any reported = case. In this period you can continue reporting bugs and issues but I = may be quite slow in replying. After version 0.85 we will have one big "Bug Fix" release and another = big "Feature Centric" release. Also there will be a "Documentation = Centric" release. Regards, Farshad Mohajeri

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "eric" wrote in message news:i%23RuPzJ8LHA.3976@anaxagvs227... > Hi Farshad, > > I'd like to know if you did some stress test with the product in different > configurations such as standalone and Isapi dll Yes, stress tests are done and will be done to make sure server core can handle as many sessions as it can. > and what are the number of sessions possible per K memories , and per > pages . > have you some ideas about ? It depends on how much RAM each session will consume. A single empty form may consume a few KB but ClientDatasets with large amount of data can make your sessions very fat.. > because i need to start a project with something with 200-300 users for an > applications with around 100 different forms. It is important to know how many user will log simultanously. Number of forms is not important. You can have as many as you like, but with more forms open in same session more memory will be consumed. .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" As I've stated many times before version 0.85.0 will play a crucial role = in this framework. It will redesign component system core with lots of = changes and enhancements.=20 Here is a list of some of these changes:=20 -"as" and "is" keywords will work as they should.=20 -Components can be created as "Web only" with no VCL implementation -All visual controls will be inherited from same root ancestor -Custom component creation will be possible. ( Of course, it is possible = to create custom components right now, but implementation details are = fairly complex) -Better OO design -Streaming of Forms will be possible -Component base for JS event handling will be prepared -and more... New core that we will introduce in v0.85 is developed under a different = branch and once it is completed I need to manually merge it into main = trunk. (An automatic merge will fail for sure because of massive changes = in some units) This may take a few days or more until merge is fully = completed and tested. While merge is under progress I can't publish = patch releases and I won't be able to test any reported case. In this = period you can continue reporting bugs and issues but I may be quite = slow in replying. After version 0.85 we will have one big "Bug Fix" release and another = big "Feature Centric" release. Also there will be a "Documentation = Centric" release. Regards, Farshad Mohajeri

Message from: "eric" Hi Farshad, I'd like to know if you did some stress test with the product in different configurations such as standalone and Isapi dll and what are the number of sessions possible per K memories , and per pages . have you some ideas about ? because i need to start a project with something with 200-300 users for an applications with around 100 different forms. thanks for your reply eric .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" If you've replicated same code in demo it should work. Can you paste your code here? "Antonio G. Gutierrez" wrote in message news:QujFJXD8LHA.3976@anaxagvs227... > Greetings, I tried to change the Theme to choose their means by the user, > so I follow the demo and megademo fishfact and not make the change .. any > suggestions? > .

Message from: "Antonio G. Gutierrez" Greetings, I tried to change the Theme to choose their means by the user, so I follow the demo and megademo fishfact and not make the change .. any suggestions? .

Message from: "Antonio G. Gutierrez" Thanks, Farshad, for your help, it all works ok "Farshad Mohajeri" escribió en el mensaje news:dXTATDw7LHA.3152@anaxagvs227... > From here > > http://www.unigui.com/doc/online_help/index.html > > See "Web Deployment" > > > "Antonio G. Gutierrez" wrote in message > news:MelAMBw7LHA.3152@anaxagvs227... >>I need to run a standalone on another machine that is not in it >> I have developed. >> Thanks >> > > .

Message from: "ayweo" Hi. My OS of the date and time format is "yyyy / MM / dd HH: mm: ss". Once in the WEB in the use of UniDateTimePicker selected Datetime value is obtained after the date wrong. .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" Hi Eric, > since 6 month i tested your tool and so far it sounds really good. > i 'd like to know just to clarify the composition of the product. > what are in few words the tech used, why it's only available for delphi > and how the links > with the third party. UniGUI basically is a Delphi native server application. It takes Delphi's Forms and convert them to web Forms. Server backend handles events generated in web browser and results are sent back to the browser. Well, it is available for Delphi maybe because I'm a Delphi developer and Delphi is my primary development tool. Another reason is that Delphi is best and probably the only remaining RAD native Win32 tool available in the market. The underlying technology in uniGUI requires direct interaction with objects, components and runtime libraries which effciently can be done in native Delphi. >My whish is to have enough informations to sponsor your product to a big >Group in order to start big projects. > More and more info will be available. Our currrent focus is on having a stable and bug free core. I will publish an update for our roadmap here in newsgroups and uniGUI blog. I will discuss what will be available beyond version 0.84. Version 0.85.0 will be a milestone for us and will open door to 3rd party component development for uniGUI. Let me know what type of projects you plan to use with uniGUI. > congratulatuions I am really impressed Thank you. Your support is appreciated. .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "goodeboy" wrote in message news:G4zxdR77LHA.1980@anaxagvs227... >I hope unigui wap or xhtml to increase the support to be used in pda or >mobile phone! UniGUI has Ext JS in its front-end which can be displayed in most mobile browsers. WAP is an outdated technology I don't think it we can support it. .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "unigui" wrote in message news:D4UvQz37LHA.1984@anaxagvs227... > > > > "Farshad Mohajeri" > дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:J7oB1Jv7LHA.3152@anaxagvs227... >> >> "unigui" wrote in message >> news:HcT4gKs7LHA.1984@anaxagvs227... >>> 1, >>> In INTRAWEB, WEBAPPLCATION.SENDFILE method can be used to send a file >>> to the client witch the documents generated in server,in UNIGUI, how to >>> realize? >>> >> >> This method will be implemented. issue #640 >> >>> 2,I need a sessionID to name of a FILE then send to file and delete it >>> on server,how can get the currenty SESSION ID? >>> >>> i cant to use the method of Uniapplication.session.sessionID, >>> >>> why? >> >> Why can't you use it? What's the problem? >> >>> >>> 3,how can i show multiseries in unichartin standaloneserver mode ? >>> >> >> issue #631 >> > My test: > > D2010 + UNIGUI0.84 standalone server Mode > > In ordinary UNIFORM ,I Can use the method of > UniAPPLICATION.UniSession.SessionID; > > But in MainModule cannot use through contrast, even if I already use in > the UniForm UniGui related units were added to the MainModule. > > I see. You need to type cast it inside MainModule. procedure TUniMainModule.UniGUIMainModuleCreate(Sender: TObject); var S : string; begin S:=TUniGUIApplication(UniApplication).UniSession.SessionID; end; .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "Cristiano Testai" >>> 4) Occours an AV if i set DataSet to DataSource in Design Time with >>> StateChange event referenced. OK. This is a "late binding" problem. New core in 0.85.0 will resolve this. logged #960 .

Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "Cristiano Testai" >>> 3) Possible bug after append method, example: There are two records in >>> UniDBGrid. Is selected the first. When performing an Append the contents >>> of the first column of the previously selected record is deleted. I can't reproduce bug in test case. , IIRC this issue was resolved in last release. Have you tested it with 0.84.5 ? .