Guest Posted January 20, 2011 Posted January 20, 2011 Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" My goal was to add full IE9 compatibility in version 0.83, but despite = all my attempts I couldn't solve all compatibility issues. Those issues = that I solved lead to more problems and created incompatibility issues = with other browsers.=20 All Ext JS samples seem to work in IE9, but with unigui it was not that = simple. IE9 is such an abomination which can mess everything if you = change a few tags in HTML or change the "document type" tags. I couldn't = find an easy solution to enable all unigui controls work as expected in = IE9 and still maintain compatibility with other browsers, so I found it = a waste of time and gave it up for now until it becomes non-beta or Ext = JS starts officially supporting it. Quote
Guest Posted January 20, 2011 Author Posted January 20, 2011 Message from: "ldb" Microsoft is really good at creating problems for developers. I think for now IE9 support is not critical. We hope that Firefox and Crome maintain a high level of development to have no more need for IE. Il 20/01/2011 10:53, Farshad Mohajeri ha scritto: > My goal was to add full IE9 compatibility in version 0.83, but despite > all my attempts I couldn't solve all compatibility issues. Those issues > that I solved lead to more problems and created incompatibility issues > with other browsers. > All Ext JS samples seem to work in IE9, but with unigui it was not that > simple. IE9 is such an abomination which can mess everything if you > change a few tags in HTML or change the "document type" tags. I couldn't > find an easy solution to enable all unigui controls work as expected in > IE9 and still maintain compatibility with other browsers, so I found it > a waste of time and gave it up for now until it becomes non-beta or Ext > JS starts officially supporting it. . Quote
Guest Posted January 20, 2011 Author Posted January 20, 2011 Message from: "Harry Rogers" ldb wrote: > Microsoft is really good at creating problems for developers. > I think for now IE9 support is not critical. > We hope that Firefox and Crome maintain a high level of development > to have no more need for IE. > > Il 20/01/2011 10:53, Farshad Mohajeri ha scritto: > > My goal was to add full IE9 compatibility in version 0.83, but > > despite all my attempts I couldn't solve all compatibility issues. > > Those issues that I solved lead to more problems and created > > incompatibility issues with other browsers. > > All Ext JS samples seem to work in IE9, but with unigui it was not > > that simple. IE9 is such an abomination which can mess everything > > if you change a few tags in HTML or change the "document type" > > tags. I couldn't find an easy solution to enable all unigui > > controls work as expected in IE9 and still maintain compatibility > > with other browsers, so I found it a waste of time and gave it up > > for now until it becomes non-beta or Ext JS starts officially > > supporting it. Chrome seems to be miles ahead of everyone at the moment in terms of Javascript speed - we certainly suggest all our customers use it whenever they can. Some IT depts do have quite rigid regimes in place however and insist on IE (whatever ver they have as the 'current'). One nice thing about Chrome is the 'application mode' - give users a shortcut pointing to PathTo\chrome.exe --app=http://ServerIpAddress:port and its not that obvious they are running a browser at all - 'it's just the client software' (if you can get to install it in the first place that is!). IE's market share is in decline and may some day not be the biggest but it's not going to happen anytime soon, so I guess support for all its faults is going to carry on well into the future. -- . Quote
Guest Posted January 21, 2011 Author Posted January 21, 2011 Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "ldb" wrote in message news:Ya5oJmIuLHA.2160@anaxagvs227... > Microsoft is really good at creating problems for developers. > I think for now IE9 support is not critical. > We hope that Firefox and Crome maintain a high level of development to > have no more need for IE. > Actually IE9 has lots of performance improvements. I can say its JS engine is faster than FireFox 3.x, but again it is not ready for daily usage. Even if it becomes the fastet browser in the market there is no reason to prefer it over FF or Chrome. . Quote
Guest Posted January 21, 2011 Author Posted January 21, 2011 Message from: "Farshad Mohajeri" "Harry Rogers" > Chrome seems to be miles ahead of everyone at the moment in terms of > Javascript speed - we certainly suggest all our customers use it > whenever they can. Some IT depts do have quite rigid regimes in place > however and insist on IE (whatever ver they have as the 'current'). One > nice thing about Chrome is the 'application mode' - give users a > shortcut pointing to > Chrome is best to run web applications. It has best render time for complex JS oebjects such as big dbgrids with lots of data > PathTo\chrome.exe --app=http://ServerIpAddress:port > > and its not that obvious they are running a browser at all - 'it's just > the client software' (if you can get to install it in the first place > that is!). > > IE's market share is in decline and may some day not be the biggest but > it's not going to happen anytime soon, so I guess support for all its > faults is going to carry on well into the future. IE market share will dramatically fall no matter what they do. There is no reason to prefer IE over other browsers. The only problem for us is IT departments who don't allow installing other browsers, so unfortunately we must continue supporting IE. . Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.