A doubt about anonymous procs

[dionel1969]

Hello:

 

It is possible to do this

 

procedure AskAsConfirmationA(const aMsg: String; aCallBack: TUniDialogCallBackAnonProc); inline;
begin
 MessageDlg(aMsg, mtConfirmation, [mbYes,mbNo], aCallBack);
end;

 

????

[Farshad Mohajeri]

Have you tested it?

[dionel1969]

Have you tested it?

 

Yes, of course and it does not work. I have a unit with some "proxy" functions or procedures to avoid write some parameters for example:

 

procedure AskAsConfirmation(const aMsg: String; aCallBack: TXXXXX); inline;
procedure AskAsError(const aMsg: String; aCallBack: TXXXXX); inline;
procedure ShowWarning(....

 

and so on.

 

They are inline procedures, so they do not generate extra "call codes", just to avoid write [mbYes, mbNo], mtWarning or mtConfirmation and so on all the time. Just for commodity.

 

In this case it does not work.

 

Prueba de Anonymous Proc.rar

[Farshad Mohajeri]

Your test case works perfectly in XE.

[dionel1969]

Your test case works perfectly in XE.

 

Then, I have to migrate from 2009 TO XE. ja ajajajaj. Let's see in the near future. It is not a a big reason, but is one more.