albertovesx Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 Here, users have suggested implement this with IIS, but in our Intranet we prefer to use Stand alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Gregory Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Hi, SSL in standalone mode is a "Must-have" feature - are there still plans to add this ? Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Farshad Mohajeri Posted April 24, 2013 Administrators Share Posted April 24, 2013 Hi, SSL in standalone mode is a "Must-have" feature - are there still plans to add this ? Peter Alreay implemented. It will be available in 0.94.0. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Rogers Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 "Already implemented. It will be available in 0.94.0." Great News !! this will be a real step forward for us. Many thanks Farshad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Gregory Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Fantastic :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markw Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Hi Farshad, SSL is really great news! Any news on when a beta of 0.94 will be out? (Sorry to ask - but I am just so excited about SSL!) Many Thanks Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Farshad Mohajeri Posted June 2, 2013 Administrators Share Posted June 2, 2013 Hi Farshad, SSL is really great news! Any news on when a beta of 0.94 will be out? (Sorry to ask - but I am just so excited about SSL!) Many Thanks Mark I'm trying to finish it. I was delayed by an unstable OS on my primary dev. machine and was busy reinstalling everything all weekend.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mortymer Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 I'm trying to finish it. I was delayed by an unstable OS on my primary dev. machine and was busy reinstalling everything all weekend.. Why not use Virtual OS for development environment? I'm using Virtualbox latest version and Windows 7 quest OS Absolute portable and work fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anachronox Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Why not use Virtual OS for development environment? I agree absolutely. Using VMware Workstation on Windows 7 as a host, and Windows 8 with RAD Studio as a guest. Virusless by design, no malware, no registry mash, all clear and isolated. In addition, using disk snapshots covers all installation/upgrades/updates failures. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chefdackel Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 I agree absolutely. Using VMware Workstation on Windows 7 as a host, and Windows 8 with RAD Studio as a guest. Virusless by design, no malware, no registry mash, all clear and isolated. In addition, using disk snapshots covers all installation/upgrades/updates failures. yes, highly recommended! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts