bruno65

With another configurations (the same for the master and the slave). Launch 25 sessions with the Stress Test Tool : i don't understand why there is only 1 active node with 9 sessions on the master. i expected more nodes and more sessions on the master among the 25 sessions and 5 max nodes on each server

another question when i use Stress Test Tool and launch 20 sessions per run : I configured 5 sessions per nodes on the master server and hyperserver runs as ISAPI through IIS why can we have more than 5 sessions in both nodes below ( respectively 8 & 10 ) ? why the hyperserver don't create more than 2 nodes ? (max nodes is 10) In the second server - the slave - hyperserver runs as service windows Only 2 users sessions on this slave server and 18 on the master server. 10 / ( 10 + 3 ) ~ 77 % of the traffic for the master Is it because max nodes is 3 for the slave and 10 for the master ? 3 / ( 10 + 3 ) * 100 ~ 23 % of the traffic for the slave But according to the documentation : 10 / ( 10 + 3 ) ~ 77 % of the traffic for the master And 3 / ( 10 + 3 ) * 100 ~ 23 % of the traffic for the slave So for 20 actives sessions : we should have 15 (or 16) sessions for the master and 5 (or 4) sessions for the slave...

Is it possible to customize logs inside the daily log files app in production environment ? an example with "A2024-04-11.log" : if users PC are inside a same local network, their public IP will be the same in the log file : how can i distinguish between these users ? Is it possible to have an a more precise message than "Violation acces" (unit name, line number) ? Of course without using EurekaLog which is not recommended according to the uniGUI documentation

my hyperserver run inside IIS and 2 nodes are actives. About memory process : the task manager gives (76432 K) and the server monitoring I read the online documentation but i need to be sure ( i have some confusion) : current memory process = current memory of hyperserver + some memory from IIS ? what about the current memory (12.476 K & 63.956 K) of nodes which are actives or not ? is there a relation with the current memory of server monitor ?

Does HyperServer Settings overload ServerModule Settings ? (Max Requests, Max Sessions, ...) In general, for upt to 2000 max connected sessions is it better to increase nodes and decrease 'sessions per node' or rather the opposite ? the idea is to have : - 3 servers : 1 master with IIS and 2 slaves - equal distribution of traffic => configure the same max nodes on each server what else ?

I understood why it is not recommended to insert or delete a row when recording a use-case and then playback. But why is it also not recommended to edit a record ? Underground the update query is not based on the inchanged primary key ?

Yes your solution it's easier

I found it ! JSConfig('sortable', [JSStatement('true')], Column.JSColumn);

Last question : why the code below is not good for sorting column ? JSConfig('sortable', [JSStatement('{"true"}')], Column.JSColumn);

Very good Sherzod ! Thank you

if I check the editor filter for data number : it's ok

I do this changes in my code function TIUMGrid.CreateJSColumn(JSColumns: TUniJSGridColumns; Column: TUniBaseDBGridColumn; ADataSet: TDataSet): TJSGridColumn; var FieldType: TFieldType; begin inherited; FieldType := DataSet.FindField(Column.FieldName).DataType; case FieldType of ftDate, ftDateTime: begin TUniFilterDBGridColumn(Column).Filter := 'date'; JSConfigObject('filter', 'fields', [JSStatement('{lt: { text: "Avant" }, gt: { text: "Après"}, eq: { text: "Le"}}')], Column.JSColumn); end else JSConfig('filter', [TUniFilterDBGridColumn(Column).Filter], Column.JSColumn); end; Strange : the editor filter of date type is now a text editor

Great ! it works fine for the popup menu items. Thank you And what do you think about the default editor itself ? (for labels of course)

like this TUniFilterDBGridColumn = class(TUniDBDesktopGridColumn) private FFilter: String; public property Filter: String read FFilter write FFilter; end; ... function TIUMGrid.CreateJSColumn(JSColumns: TUniJSGridColumns; Column: TUniBaseDBGridColumn; ADataSet: TDataSet): TJSGridColumn; begin inherited; JSConfig('filter', [TUniFilterDBGridColumn(Column).Filter], Column.JSColumn); end; ... procedure TFrameListeCommun.CreateFilters; var i:integer; FieldType: TFieldType; Column: TUniDBGridColumn; begin // grdListe.JSInterface.JSConfigPlugin('Ext.grid.filters.Filters', ['id', 'gridFilters']); for i := 0 to grdListe.Columns.Count - 1 do begin Column := grdListe.Columns[i]; // Column.Filtering.Enabled := True; Column.Sortable := True; FieldType := grdListe.DataSource.DataSet.FindField(Column.FieldName).DataType; case FieldType of ftString : TUniFilterDBGridColumn(Column).Filter := 'string'; ftDate, ftDateTime: TUniFilterDBGridColumn(Column).Filter := 'date'; ftInteger, ftFloat: TUniFilterDBGridColumn(Column).Filter := 'number'; ftBoolean : TUniFilterDBGridColumn(Column).Filter := 'boolean'; else TUniFilterDBGridColumn(Column).Filter := 'list'; // grdListe.JSInterface.JSConfig('filter', ['list'], Column.JSColumn); end; end; end;

I use Delphi code (not extjs) : JSConfigPlugin('Ext.grid.filters.Filters', ['id', 'gridFilters']); So how can i translate in Delphi code ? and is it possible to change labels inside default editors ? (see the screenshot above : example for date type)

Well i found a workaround

How can i change default labels 'Filters', 'Before', and so on... in another language ?

no one has encountered this issue and situation ?

Another more question with the same project : Farshad doesn't recommend to use TExUniCustomDBGrid(UniDBGrid1).DoConfigureJSColumns(UniDBGrid1.DataSource.DataSet); in purpose to hide/show filter columns or sort columns. So, how to hide/show dynamically filter columns or sort columns in a safe way ?

Why i got a convert error when i try to use filter in date column or number column ? (simple project is attached) testUniDBGridFilterAndSort.zip

Any solution to fix bugs in the last attached project ?

Hi Sherzod, one more information : even if i modify the project by creating all columns in design mode the same bug appears

by completing the previously attached project I can generate this bug again. Use-case : 1 - modify one or more cells in one or more records 2- click the button "Sauver" for saving data (and reload it) Redo the 2 steps above one more (or several) time again... and you'll get the error at step 1 and any cell could not be modified. The application is OUT testUniDBGridFilterAndSort.zip

the bug can happen whatever the speed of clicking on the buttons. There is really no effect to generate the bug Beside we are interesting of how to disable a button until the next click for other use cases : can you share us the code ?

Hi Sherzod, reproduce the bug is not trivial. It seems to occur "randomly" after clicking on the 2 buttons but it could be happened quickly